User:Pandas forest/Origin of life/Milenale13 Peer Review

General info
Pandas forest
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Pandas forest/Origin of life
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Abiogenesis

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead: I like that you explained where exactly you wanted to put your new information in. This is really helpful as I don't have to ask or estimate where you would like to put the information into the current article! I would suggest though adding a brief description of the article's major sections and an introductory sentence on the topic itself.

Content: The content seems relevant and up to date. De novo protein research seems really cool along with a deeper dive into evidence of abiotic polypeptide synthesis. I feel like the context of this work provides a thorough examination of the proposed routes for prebiotic peptide synthesis, highlighting both experimental evidence and theoretical considerations.

Tone & Balance: The tone is nice and neutral. The balance seems good as well and doesn't use too many complex words and is fairly easy to read.

Sources & References: Your references are all scientific articles and have been peer reviewed which is really good!

Organization: The organization looks great and I appreciate the bolding and how difficult words have a link to what they are.

Images & Media: none

Overall: This looks really good to me! The organization is really nice and easy to read. The sources are formatted and added correctly. It also seems like this be a nice addition to the wikipedia article.