User:Paola.Franco-Negron/Indigo Children/Tashany.Velazquez Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Paola.Franco-Negron
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Paola.Franco-Negron/Indigo Children

Lead
The Lead has a concise and clear introductory sentence that describes the article’s topic.

Content
The information in the article is relevant. It provides information that helps understand the topic better.

Tone and Balance
The content added is neutral, and it does not try to persuade the readers in any way. The article is well-balanced in its sections.

Sources and References
The sources used in the article are reliable, and the links work correctly. However, several sources in some of the claims are from a couple of years back (2001, 2007, 2013, etc.). They might need improvement.

Organization
The content added is well-written and easy to read. Some sentences are missing commas and introductory commas (e.g., In 1982 Tappe published a comb-bound which she expanded and republished in paperback in 1986 as Understanding Your Life Thru Color.). Others have grammatical errors (e.g., Indigo children can be great on with some skills or subjects in school.) Overall, the article does not have major grammatical or spelling errors. Every part of the article is well-organized and divided into sections. They help with the understanding and clarity of the topic.

Overall impressions
So far, the article is good. It has minor details that need fixing. The content added improved the article and helps in its completeness.