User:Paoof/Electron donor/Etholn Peer Review

General info
(Paoof)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Paoof/Electron donor:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Electron donor

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Content:

The citations are from 2014 and 2016 which are recent enough with context to the topic. The content added is relevant to the topic. The edited content is a good mixture of background information and examples. In the original article, there is an In Biology section, it may be possible to merge that with photosynthesis as they are both examples of electron donation.

Tone and Balance:

The tone is neutral and no biases are present. All the statements are informative and do not carry opinions.

Sources and referencess:

Bouth sources are reliable references such as journals and textbooks. The content reflect what the sources say. In the second source, there may be a better source for more in depth information. Since the source is a digital textbook, it is good to learn the basics and surface level information, but articles may provide you a deeper understanding on that topic.

Organization:

It has yet been integrated with the original article, but much of the information are relevant and fit with the original well.

Overall, the information added is good quality and additional examples make the article more accessable for a wider audience. The added content could go into more details for the examples.