User:Papcho/Social spam/Aniang1 Peer Review

Peer review
I am reviewing the work of username: @Papcho. The link to the draft: Social spam

Lead
The lead is concise and accurately describes the article. It includes the article's major section but lacks description on the main sections.

Content
Content added to the section is relevant to the topic and explains it well. The information being used is based on the recent years, in conclusion it provides a good understanding with recent research and information that has been available.

Tone and Balance
The tone is balanced and presented in a research manner. It does not lean to a particular point of view and is neutral.

Sources and References
The sources are accurate and scholarly. After reviewing the links they all work and help the reader verify it's credibility.

Organization
It is well organized and has good patterns of information presentation.

Images and Media
The article lacks visual representation of the content.

Overall impressions
The content added improves the overall quality of the topic. It is helpful and backed my reliable sources. Parts that need improvement is the introduction it lacks explanation of major sections and more information could be added to provide the reader with a better understanding.