User:Paranormal Skeptic/arbcom

In regards to Justanother/Justallofthem/Justahulk
Nice, on a scale of 1-10 for civility, this is probably a 1. He attacks two editors in one shot: 

Edit summary: "As scientologists say it" - Why would we care how Scientologist say it? 

After a heated discussion, which was not leaning into incivility and personal attacks by most of the parties involved: 

Even with multiple references, still arguing against putting Scientology in any possible bad light, finally agreeing to one: 

As the discussion was not going in his/her favor, Justallofthem proposed removing any usefulness to the list, which would in effect cause it to loose it's Start Class, relegating it to Stub: 

Edit summary: "Snort" How is this being civil? 

A personal attack leveled at Cirt: 

Using data gathered from a previous ArbCom and referencing it is not wrong for an Admin to do. Admins are there to help prevent COI.

Again, holding the position that the Church of Scientology owned IP's should be able to edit freely on COI articles. 

Again, not working towards consensus, but rather using ad hominem to attack an editor (Myself when I laid the fact of a known COI through arbcom against an accusation of COI against Cirt): 

Removed an entire section from an ArbCom'd article with no discussion on talk page: 

Many other edits are there showing that Justallofthem can not maintain a civil manner while working towards consensus on any topic related to Scientology. While not explicitly prohibited, Justallofthem appears to be a SPA; only coming out to edit when Scientology's good name is at stake, then goes about attacking any user that has conflicted with him in other articles.

In regards to Shutterbug
User had a previous user name as being the Pseudo official editor of the Church of Scientology, now declares it's impossible, always attacking an editor who would like to add anything negative to articles: 

No way to maintain civility, and obvious COI when they are requesting a "Rep from Scientology" to appear: 

Removing the "bad lighting": 

Again, removing any instance of "Bad Lighting": 

And nothing on the ctribs except for Scientology Articles, indicating an SPA: 

In regards to Cirt
Doing normal janitor/part-tme editor work: 

How many featured articles/portals again?: 

Summary of Comments
Much of the evidence I was going to post I removed for brevity due to it being presented be other users. What I can see is at least one SPA, one possible SPA, and an Admin doing normal work.

Shutterbug only edits Scientology related articles, from a number of Scientology owned IP addresses. This would fall along the same lines as allowing an employee from the Microsoft editing articles only about Microsoft related topics from a Microsoft owned network address.

Justanother/Justallofthem/Justahulk borders on incivility to the point that one of the running jokes on Wikinews is that "it is a crack whore" ; and only comes out of his "wikibreak" when anything related to be-smirching Scientology's name comes up.

Cirt has contributed numerous featured articles, portal, news stories, et al across the Wikimedia Project. FA is nothing to slouch at since it is strenuously reviewed by a number of editors prior to making FA. Same goes for portals and the news stories.