User:Parkerorr2/Amateurism in the NCAA/Coffeyrh Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Parkerorr2


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Parkerorr2/Amateurism in the NCAA
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Amateurism in the NCAA

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Reviewing this article was a pleasure to help guide this user with their article. Parker stated that this was the basis of the article in the Lead section. Parker discusses the NIL which is related to name, image, and likeness. This article discusses the compensation of collegiate athletes. The content provided this far is neutral, researched and well stated. There isn't much to review currently but we are in the drafting stage as my own draft doesn't have much to review either. Overall I'd suggest to expand on the lead and make a solid contribution to the body. The references used were solid as the links worked and were relevant to the topic. Recommendations would be expanding on how these athletes will be compensated and which sports will be compensated more than others as revenue differs from sport to sport.