User:Pashf001/Karyosome/Bike2022 Peer Review

Hi!

I approve of the many changes you made in the article to make it clear and up-to-date. You undoubtedly did your research based on the amount of information added to the article, which allows readers a better understanding and more informative background than what once was about Karyosomes. The original (untouched) article is vague for a science topic and short, so making the additions you did made it more appealing to a science background.

There are a couple of changes I suggest. Readers would enjoy a visual, so adding a photo would draw more attention and curiosity from the reader. Adding a photo and description of what it is under would do wonders. Also, with the information added, which was great, more critiquing for sentence structure and grammar can be incorporated. Finally, adding an overview would be helpful. The separated categories are informative, but in addition to that, adding an overview/summary would give the reader a refresher on the material.

The effort is commendable, and the amount which was added to the original is appreciated. You did well adding to the critical part, like the formation and function of Karyosomes. The corrections made are a clear gist of the topic and original; well done.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)