User:Pastaaa01/sandbox

User:Pastaaa01/sandbox

topic: relevant technology, consumer electronics (mobile phone industry)

article topic: Consumer electronics

evaluation of the article


 * The one topic that distracted me from the article topic was IEEE initiatives, which is Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, there were not a lot of information about the topic article (consumer electronics), only states how IEEE is a professional society that promotes consumer electronics. All the other topics are relevant to the article topic.
 * There is only one footnote which is at the end. The references are mostly from data (money watch,CEA: industry sales data etc) or articles by other people. Most of the sources seem reliable, even though lot of the are articles the author has references that support them.
 * The ext overall is clear and understandable, the structure is clear.
 * The article is neutral, but i found one frames that seemed bias and also there was no source of where the information was coming of "Sleeping less prevents people from performing to their full potential physically and mentally", this argument had no reference.
 * The viewpoints of the benefits of consumer technology was underrepresented while the affects (presumedly negative) were overrepresented.
 * These were some of the sources i checked "https://www.emarketer.com/articles","http://www.chicagobusiness.com/article/20140125/ISSUE01/301259976/why-consumer-electronics-retailers-are-the-next-record-store", http://thewip.net/2015/07/12/health-risks-of-electronic-devices/". The links to these three websites worked, there seemed to be not a lot of close paraphrasing or plagiarism in the article, because the first two links had good citation while the last one was a doctor who consulted the health risks of electronic devices.
 * Most of the sources where from 2014 and four years have gone by, the electronics has changed so much so information about todays consumer technologies, health studies and industry etc will be helpful to reach to current audience.

comments : talk page

merge timeline:

We should remove the information about IEEE initiatives, number five from the table of contents because 1) there is no information furthering the article topic (consumer electronics), 2) states only the IEEE society.