User:Pat Miner23/R. Revans/Ksihapanya Peer Review

General info
PatMiner23
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Pat Miner23/Reg Revans
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Reg Revans

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * PatMiner23 did not write a lead for the article draft.
 * The content of PatMiner23 is relevant to the topic of Reg Revans. The content seems up-to-date. There could be content that is missing, PatMiner23 only mentions Action Learning and Reg Revans legacy.
 * The content seems pretty neutral and unbiased.
 * PatMiner23 provides many sources of citation within his article draft. The sources cited seem to be pretty current in the fact that it comes from journals, pdfs, and books.
 * The content is written pretty well within this draft article. It is organized pretty well, given the amount of content in the draft.
 * There are no images or media within this draft.
 * Overall I feel like PatMiner23 has created a good draft for the article on Reg Revans. They have added content about Action Learning and the Legacy. The only thing I would have to recommend is that he edit more of the article or add some visuals of Reg Revans.