User:PaterPeter

Socrates is supposed to have said he was willing to discuss with anyone who 1) has a conviction (pathos); 2) can define / explain the meaning of each word / concept he uses (logos); and 3) is consistent in using these words / concepts, i.e. that every time he uses a word / concept, it has the same meaning (ethos).

These three principles I believe should apply in all conversations and discussions. Not least important is this for us who are involved in editing Wikipedia!

Since it is impossible that all words / concepts mean the same thing for everyone who uses Wikipedia, it is my goal that each article should be written in a logical and ethical manner. And that when it is difficult to achieve consensus from a neutral point of view, original research and verifiability, then I see two accessible ways. One is to find a better word that in itself is not currently perceived emotionally charged and causes the article to take a stand in any direction. The other is to explain what the value-charged word means in the article.