User:Patkeo6/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Ernest Nagel

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
This article focuses on an area we have not yet covered in class, so I wanted to learn a little more about it. I also chose it because it does not have a large talk section, but a long edit history.

Evaluate the article
The lead section is concise and to the point. It has the major points associated with Earnest Nagel.

The content is a little short and only has one subsection included in it. I noticed on the second paragraph of the Life and career section that it is lacking any citations. It was suggested that citations be made at least once per paragraph in the training, so that could be a worthy edit. The last few lines of the article are also missing some key citations.

The talk page has a couple questions on it but not a lot of overall activity. The discussions on the talk page are disputes about different facts mentioned in the article.

The article is fairly up to date, with the last revision being in January of 2023.