User:Patriciatrinidad19/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title:The first article I am considering is: Nepo baby.:
 * Article Evaluation:I believe that this article's content is relevant to the topic and it is written neutrally. However, there are many instances where this article needs citations. For example, there is a sentence in the article where the website, New York Magazine and their findings are mentioned, but there are no citations to support it. On the other hand, I think the lead section provides an accurate definition of the term "Nepo Baby," but it does not provide a summary of the article. Also, for the majority of the article, the claims are cited, but then there are some places where they are needed. In fact, the article has footnotes that say, "citations needed" or "failed verification." Therefore, if I were to work on this, I would make sure to clean up those mistakes. Another important aspect of this article is that The New York Times, Forbes, Vox, and the Guardian are cited as some of their popular sources. Finally, I think this article could tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps, specifically the misrepresented population. This because Nepo Babies are usually seen in a negative light, but I will try to paint both sides to eliminate any bias.:
 * Sources:https://catalystmcgill.com/hollywood-oligarchies-and-the-nepo-baby/ https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/celebrities/2022/03/15/famous-families-nepotism-babies-hollywood-maude-apatow-tracee-ellis-ross/9437227002/

Option 2

 * Article title:The second article I am considering is: Young & Hungry.:
 * Article Evaluation:To begin, this article's content does correlate with its topic. However, I wish that this article would have provided a detailed summary of what this article is about in the lead section. The reason being is that as you continue to read it, there is new material about the TV show that was not mentioned in the beginning. Also, this article has a somewhat neutral tone, as there are some adjectives that makes its content unbalanced. I noticed in the lead that there are many citations, but as you read the "Plot" section, there are no citations at all. After checking the different citations, I would say that there is a mix of good and bad sources. For example, Variety and Bustle are two examples of reliable sources. However, there are some sources I am unfamiliar with so their credibility is questionable. Finally, this TV show article does not discuss Wikipedia's equity gaps.:
 * Sources:https://screenrant.com/young-hungry-season-6-updates-release-date-story/ https://deadline.com/2018/03/young-hungry-canceled-end-after-5-seasons-season-5b-premiere-date-followup-movie-in-the-works-freeform-1202338552/

Option 3

 * Article title:The third article I am considering is: R.E.M. Beauty.:
 * Article Evaluation:I believe that the information in this article is relevant to the subject matter, however, there is some information that could go under another header because it doesn't quite fit in the section that it is currently in. I think the lead also needs improvement as it does not provide background information on what the article is about. After reviewing the article, each claim does not have its own citation. There are a few citations here and there. To me, some of these popular sources seem reliable. For example, the article cites Harper's Bazaar, Vogue, and Forbes, which are sources that I find to be credible most of the time. Finally, this article does not tackle Wikipedia's equity gaps.:
 * Sources:https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/ariana-grande-rem-beauty-line-b1954512.html

Option 4

 * Article title:The fourth article I am considering is a new article for Buffy the Vampire Slayer 's reboot: Slayers: A Buffyverse Story .:
 * Article Evaluation:This new article would be a great addition to Wikipedia because it will add new content to the discourse surrounding Buffy the Vampire Slayer. As a fan of this iconic show, I believe I can write this article in a neutral tone so that I can follow Wikipedia's policies. This article does not yet have citations but it will because there is a lot of buzz on this reboot, and many websites are outlining the premise of it. In fact, this reboot is going to be on Audible and will not be a live-action type of reboot. Finally, this article would not tackle Wikipedia's equity gaps.:
 * Sources:https://ew.com/podcasts/buffy-the-vampire-slayer-stars-returning-audible-series/ https://www.cnn.com/2023/09/13/entertainment/buffy-audible-original-slayer/index.html

Option 5
Another article that is similar to this idea but has its own page is, Notion (productivity software). Some other options include: Crying in H Mart/ Japanese Breakfast, Yankee Candle, Tombow, This Is What It Feels Like (EP), and Shiba Inu.
 * Article title:The fifth article I am considering is: GoodNotes 6 (note-taking application). I would like to talk about its features, particularly its lasso tool.:
 * Article Evaluation:This particular article does not yet have its own page on Wikipedia, which is surprising because many students today use it to take notes for class. This article can be written in a neutral perspective if I find sources that only outline how the features work. While this is a fun idea to write an article about, this could be difficult as there are many biased reviews on the Internet. However, I will try to find independent sources because many websites tend to promote or advertise this application. If I choose to do this article, I will cite the different sources that help me explain its features. Also, the sources must be reliable, so I will make sure to find those websites that are consistent with their facts, and are not just advertising this app to individuals. Finally, I do not believe this article would tackle Wikipedia's equity gaps.:
 * Sources:https://sea.mashable.com/tech/26069/goodnotes-6-the-ipads-most-advanced-notes-app-gets-turbocharged-with-ai After trying to find sources for this article, many authors compare this to other note-taking apps, and the authors also share the opinions on whether they like it or not. Therefore, because this article option lacks reliable or unbiased sources, I will choose one of the other choices I thought of.