User:PatrickDenney3/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Talk:Amoeba

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article to evaluate because it pertains to amoeba, which seems like an interesting subject to navigate. It matters because amoeba are in integral part of our environments, and my preliminary impression was that the article has a lot of information that is assorted sporadically.

Evaluate the article
The lead section of this wikipedia page is very consolidated and gives a clear outline of the basic information on the subject; no information is given that isn't later addressed, and there isn't too much detail. The content is very relevant to the topic and up-to-date. As far as I know, no important information is missing from the subject. Every area seems like it has a balanced amount of information. The article is written in a neutral tone, and no form of bias seems to be present; each point is given factually and without over/underrepresenting facts. Each factual claim is backed with a reference to a source, and these sources are thorough. These sources are pretty up-to-date, with most being as resent as 2010's. I don't think any of the sources have many better options available and each comes from a well respected journal/source. In terms of organization and writing, I think the article is definitely well-written and without any noticeable errors. Each subtopic is organized in a way that flows easily. Images are included where necessary to help boost understanding of the topics, and these images are captioned well.

The talk section of the page had multiple conversations active, including one on some grammatical changes and one on adding a couple other species to the table in the article. Mainly the talking consisted of additional information and sources. This article is a C-class rated article.

Overall, the article has many strengths. It's well written, organized, and informational. The article could be improved with more information and details on certain subclasses of amoeba since the topic is very broad. Personally, I think the article is well-developed and pretty much complete in the information given on amoeba.