User:Patroclus99/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Postgraduate research

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose Postgraduate Research because it has become a staple of the American higher education, but I know little about it. Overall, this article is good in the sense that it has a historical basis, but it is rather short and does not go into more complex issues with modern scholarship.

Evaluate the article
Lead

- Well written topic sentence that tells the articles focus.

- Sufficient but could be expanded.

- It is concise and well detailed, however.

Content

- Could be expanded to talk more about the present state of scholarship.

- However, the content is relevant.

- It does not mention aspects of race, gender, and sexuality and their intersections with research.

Tone

- Very neutral and well written.

Sources

- Very limited

- Could be fleshed out more and from more varied sources

- Relies on university's reporting

Images

-Are none, but would benefit from some.

Talk

-Discussions about public university research and qualifications for research across the world.

-rated Stub Class

Overall

-Good on what is there

-Needs expanding on a number of topics

-could use images and other media to help it