User:Patvil24/Axie Infinity/DJWellaaa Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Patvil24


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Axie Infinity


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Axie Infinity

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The lead does not look like it was updated for this assignment, but the lead itself was already clear and concise.

The main edit I could see from the user was a reword, changing the term "comission" for a term the user thought fit the model more accurately.

There was one edit from the user that was overruled by another Wiki author, citing that the source was not up to Wiki standards and therefore removed.

It is a very well organized article, thought I must admit I know absolutely nothing about what the article is talking about. I can tell that the contributors, however, have decently detailed knowledge of the subject.

Seeing as how its newer, there is not much more information available than what is already included, but the source list is long enough to count as legitimate.