User:Patvil24/Axie Infinity/Jnolan27 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Patvil24


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Patvil24/Axie Infinity
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Axie Infinity

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * Lead
 * Yes, the lead was very well in my opinion. It gave me a good understanding of the game. I thought the explanation of where the game originated from was a very good idea to inform viewers on the games background.
 * Content
 * The content was very well. I was interested in the section explaining how the graphics are created for the video game. The explanation of previous gameplays was very well too, and offered a good comparison to the newest version.
 * Tone & Balance
 * The content was certainly unbiased. I though the tone was well, and the draft was well balanced so far. I cannot wait to see the live version to see how it wraps up!
 * Sources and References
 * The sources and references were used well, and offered a lot more validity and credibility to the authors draft.
 * Organization
 * Although it is just the body so far, I thought the author provided a lot of useful content, and it was well organized too.
 * The sources and references were used well, and offered a lot more validity and credibility to the authors draft.
 * Organization
 * Although it is just the body so far, I thought the author provided a lot of useful content, and it was well organized too.
 * Although it is just the body so far, I thought the author provided a lot of useful content, and it was well organized too.