User:Patvil24/Axie Infinity/Queenones87 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

PatVil24


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Patvil24/Axie_Infinity?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Axie Infinity

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead - The lead is very short and could use additional information. I'm assuming you are still working on adding to this section.

Content - All of the content added is relevant to the original article and appears to be up to date.

Tone and Balance - The overall tone of the article is good. Nothing comes off as bias and it is written in a neutral tone. I would say as far as viewpoints go, you could also include negative reviews. You go on to talk about the positive comment surround the game, but including some negative feedback would solidify non biases. Regardless, there is not attempt to really persuade either way.

Sources and Reference - Overall there are a lot of sources added to the article, however only one is used in the article itself. I'm sure you are still in the process of expanding the article and plan to add the additional sources as you expand. The sources all seem to be peer reviewed and the links work. They are written by a diverse group of people and all seem to be current.

Organization - I feel like your article is well written and concise. It focuses on the new addition to the game including all of the changes made to better it. Everything was well organized and thought out. I did notice one potential spelling error. You write, "...with reviewers stating that the much needed upgraded was 'engaging'..." I think you meant upgrade, instead of upgraded.

Overall Impressions - I think you have a really good start to your article with plenty of resources allowing you to expand on it. I look forward to what else you add to this article regarding this interesting game. I feel like there is a lot of potential here.