User:PaulaUPRC/N95 mask/Kamila.tavarez Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * User: PaulaUPRC
 * Article's sandbox: User:PaulaUPRC/N95 mask

Lead evaluation
The lead of this article has been slightly changed, but it reflects very well the content of the entire article. However, it feels overly detailed. In this section of the article I'm primarily searching for a good introduction or some information that concisely describe the topic, but without giving to much detail The last paragraph that's been recently added in the sandbox was very well constructed, and even though I would recommend moving it some paragraphs before, it reflects the idea of how concise the lead part must preferably be.

Content evaluation
The article's content its up to date since is a topic that's been mentioned lately. However, int the Covid-19 Pandemic section, the last paragraph can be moved to another section or removed since it's talking about people's health when the last paragraph was talking of international issues between the United States' government and Berlin.

I would recommend to double check the first sentence of the Lead and COVID-19 pandemic section because they are the description of the images of the original article. Maybe while the user was copy pasting the article in the sandbox the description got copied without the picture by error.

Tone and balance evaluation
The article's content is neutral. In the Covid-19 Pandemic section the United States' President, Donald Trump, is mentioned as well as other conflicts between countries. This part can be seen as biased, but the it's neutrally written.

Sources and references evaluation
The new added content its backed up with current sources. Even though the sources weren't in the user's bibliography page, they look reliable and reflect the content of the article. There's two new sources and both have a diverse spectrum of authors.

Organization evaluation
The user PaulaUPRC did a good job with the new added information. It is concise, related to the topic, and supported with reliable sources. However, I would recommend move the last paragraph of the Covid-19 Pandemic section to another section of the article since it doesn't connect with the paragraphs above it.

Overall evaluation
Some parts of the article have been improved. There's been a lot of grammar and spelling corrections. The new information it's good since it widens the article's information, but it can be improved checking that it's located in the correct section of the article. I would recommend double checking word precision. In the lead section “Provides protection” can be changed for “protects”, on the COVID-19 Pandemic section “came to an agreement” can be changed for “agreed”. This are my recommendations for the improvement of the article.