User:Paulruback/sandbox

Article evaluation of the fast fashion Wikipedia page. I have also placed my evaluation in the Talk page of the article "Fast fashion."

The article starts with a definition of 'fast fashion' however, that definition is not as integral to the growing environmental consciousness of consumers. Instead, I would suggest the third paragraph be moved to the forefront of the article. I suggest this because the focus of the search topic 'fast fashion' has shifted from a terminology lookup, to an ever-growing movement.

The article appears to be unbiased in presenting facts. However, the mention of the "boho-chic" era of style seems to be distracting. I say this because it is redundant and not as accurate when compared with the paragraph directly following in regard to the "quick response" manufacturing method developed in the '80s. Furthermore, it seems that the "quick response" method was more instrumental in the development of this production method, now termed 'fast fashion', than was the "boho-chic" style of dressing; because of these repeated points, there is too much emphasis on when the method emerged when in-fact, rapid clothing production has always been present.