User:Payswan73/User experience design/SydneyL23 Peer Review

General info
Payswan73
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:N/A
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):User experience design

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * No
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * No
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * I don't think so
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * It is concise, but could benefit from more information that better outlines the article.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * No added content
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * No added content
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * I don't think there is anything missing, but the article cover sooooo much information that it seems likely some of it doesn't belong and is unnecessary. As a reader, the article is so overwhelming that the information almost becomes meaningless.
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?
 * No

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Content in the article as a whole seems to be neutral.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * No
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * No

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say? (You'll need to refer to the sources to check this.)
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
 * Are there better sources available, such as peer-reviewed articles in place of news coverage or random websites? (You may need to do some digging to answer this.)
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * No.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Not that I noticed
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic
 * Absolutely not. The article is basically a list of different topics that fall under UX design, but the list is not sorted logically, and things are not connected together at all, so it is almost impossible to digest the information.  All sections of the article are approximately the same length, though some topics (like usability and accessibility) should be more important than the others.  Also, the subsections are not clearly marked and hard to differentiate.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved?