User:Peachyjjk0613/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating
Polycystic ovary syndrome - Wikipedia

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.

I chose this article because I struggle with hormonal imbalance and a high chance of infertility.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)


 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference?
 * Yes this article has a lot of citations that I would deem reliable.
 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * Nothing distracted me in the article and the what's written in the article is relevant to the article topic.
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Nothing is biased it is neutral.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Epidemiology, history and society and culture are shorter sections and can probably use some more information.
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Is there any close paraphrasing or plagiarism in the article?
 * Yes the links work and as far as I can detect there is no plagiarism
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * Maybe more on the history and epidemiology could be added.
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Is there any close paraphrasing or plagiarism in the article?
 * Yes the links work and as far as I can detect there is no plagiarism
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * Maybe more on the history and epidemiology could be added.
 * Maybe more on the history and epidemiology could be added.