User:Pedia19960514

I'm currently a community college student who is South Korean. I am going to major in Aviation Maintenance. I am interested in sports such as soccer and basketball which I can play with people. I can not just feel fresh but also learn how to work with people after playing that sports. That is why I would like to play such sports whenever I have extra time. My family member consists of my parents and an older brother who is one year older than me. I spent about 2 years in Korean military as a tank shooter. The time made me mentally and physically strong.

This is my first time to write something in Wikipedia while I've spent plenty of time for a large number of articles. I am planning to spend some time posting fascinating articles based on factual information. Then, I would like to get more useful knowledge from articles written by other users. I also hope you are able to distinguish if any articles you read are fake or not. We should be responsible to write article involving accurate and reliable information as well.

Thank you for your time.

Introduction
I have been interested in the Hangul which is Korean alphabet used to write Korean language because it has changed since it was created in the 15th century by one of the best kings named Sejong. Even if I am Korean and I know how to write with the Hangul, I was wondering if correct information is posted on Wikipedia. I visited the Hangul page on Wikipedia, and found three aspects of it worth commenting on: its wrong information, its lack of citation, and its lack of example.

Wrong information
First of all, while looking at this document, I noticed that the document has wrong information saying that the modern Hangul consists of total 24 letters with 14 consonant letters and 10 vowel letters. However, it is actually made up with total 40 letters with 21 constant letters including double constant and 19 vowel letters. Another wrong information is that the document says that ancient Korean document should be read from the top to bottom and right to left. The books are usually read with that method but it is not read like that always.

Lack of citation
Secondly, once you look around the document, you will know that there is not enough citations. Even if you go through the citation number posted on website, it did not include proper information so, it is not possible to verify it. When I was checking the reference from some information, I could not get information I want. Writers should be responsible to use citation by using precise information.

Lack of example
Finally, writer posted all constant letters and vowel letters by using some graphs on the page. However, people cannot totally understand the Korean alphabet with the few information. If there were some examples, it might help people to understand the Korean letter. The document does not have enough information for the Hangul, I understood what the document is saying but, if people who Korean is not their mother tongue they may not be able to totally understand the document.

Conclusion
As a result, it was pretty hard to find the lack aspects. It means that the document is almost perfect. However, the document does not consists of accurate information and citation. I hope the document to be developed little bit more by adding some example which help for people interested in the Hangul. I am going to post my opinion on the talk page as well.