User:Pedreco

Pedreco, if this is Pedro Aguiar, please stop. This is not the sort of information that goes on Wikipedia. Articles about idiosyncratic things like micronations are not the purpose of Wikipedia. Take it from me (Matt). - Montr&eacute;alais

Au contraire. Add away. Just please don't use the CIA World Factbook style; use Wikipedia style; that is, primarily paragraph-based (see Atlantium for a fully fledged example-- Porto Claro is in the right direction). --The Cunctator

Why should these be here? Do we allow other idiosyncratic phenomena? - Montr&eacute;alais


 * Agreed, these are pretty sophomoric. I thought our goal was to produce a serious encyclopedia. Danny

I seriously doubt the value of the material being listed by Pedreco. Many of the listed micronations are defunct, and a significant proportion of the data being included in articles for those that are not is complete and utter fantasy. Wikipedia is not a work of fiction. These are fictional listings and should therefore be deleted. There *are* a tiny handful of micronations that have an extensive documented history (ie not just a web page) and some form of existence in the "real world" but they are either already dealt with in the "micronation" article, or have their own separate articles already.