User:Pedrofm00/sandbox

Group Sandbox: User:Nbaraz/sandbox

Set the style of your text. For example, make a header or plain paragraph text. You can also use it to offset block quotes.

Article Evaluation: "Nanofluid"

- Everything in the article does seem relevant to the topic, including possible uses of the nanofluids and how why these uses are possible with nanofluids. However, it is sometimes not entirely clear why these properties are not exhibited in large scale fluids, or what nanoparticles induce what kinds of differences in the nanofluids.

- None of the information seems out of date, necessarily, with the oldest cited source being 16 years old (which is definitely towards the boundary of "recent"), but most sources are from the last 5-10 years, suggesting that the information is relatively new and up to date.

- In order to improve the article further, more applications of nanofluids could be cited and explained, perhaps leading to new ideas being generated around the topic and allowing for further research to stem from this and advance the field, perhaps adding even more to the article in the future (once it has been verified and reviewed).

- The article seems to be written from a neutral and scientific standpoint, with all mentioned applications and topics discussed in a scholarly and unslanted manner. There does seem to be a veyr heavy focus on the cooling properties of nanofluids above all else, though this may just be due to their extreme prevalence in such areas.

- The citations I checked did link to the appropriate articles, and these articles (based on their abstracts) did seem to support the claims made on the wikipedia article page. These sources are also from reliable scientific journals, being peer-reviewed and cited many times by other scholars and researchers.

- Very few conversations are happening on the talk page, with a few people asking questions about the article and other posts by bots citing sources automatically.

-