User:Peiyu Wan/LGBT culture in Chengdu/Mollyanders Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

This article was super informative and interesting but it sounded a little too much like a research paper and not like a wikipedia page. To fix this, I took out all the direct article references and rephrased the sentence. I didn't completely take out the reference, I just replaced the actual citation with a reference number. I also took out a direct quote that could put this article at risk for a copyright violation. Other than that, it was really great and I learned a lot!


 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * Everything was relevant!
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Peiyu did a great job at keeping it neutral. Very fact based.
 * Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * The links worked, the structure within the article was just a little off. I helped fix this a little bit but I encourage Peiyu to go back and rephrase the sentences I fixed because she knows more about this topic than I do so she might have a better way of saying things.
 * Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * Again, the sources were great but it was a little biased just because it mentioned in the article who said these things. This could be interpreted as promotion for the article/authors used.
 * Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * Again, the sources were great but it was a little biased just because it mentioned in the article who said these things. This could be interpreted as promotion for the article/authors used.
 * Again, the sources were great but it was a little biased just because it mentioned in the article who said these things. This could be interpreted as promotion for the article/authors used.

Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added?

I think everything is up to date. Could be beneficial to add something about Chengdu as of right now (2023).

Good Job Peiyu! Great article, thanks for choosing this topic!

Mollyanders (talk) 21:30, 24 January 2023 (UTC)