User:Pejames21/Alluvial river/Bo789 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(Pejames21)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Pejames21/Alluvial river


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Alluvial river

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Good job! The section written was neutral and informative. I also like the sources you used. I know we are not necessarily supposed to be suggesting changes to grammar or word use, and I not know what stage you are in writing this. But just as a suggestion, for the second paragraph, I would change the following for a more formal tone: "The creation of dams in alluvial rivers can drastically alter their functionality. Being able to understand Understanding the natural attributes of alluvial rivers is necessary when considering restoring their function on small-scale levels below dams. Though the function of the rivers may never be fully restored, it is possible to recreate and preserve their integrity with proper planning and consideration of their necessary attributes."

For the first paragraph, the use of different scales was slightly confusing and unclear. One sentence says "These short and long-term scales" even though no short term scales were mentioned (although small spatial scales were mentioned, and this may have been included in the existing wiki page!). I would recommend reviewing those first sentences and checking for clarity and conciseness around the different scales mention.