User:Penelopearthur/Psychology/Alyssalauri Peer Review

Dear Psychology Group,

We really like you addition! It is really dense and has tons of good information and very strong female psychologists. This addition to an existing entry is very informative and adds so much to the page! It’s not exactly clear on where this is going as the formatting is hard to understand due to the doc. Is this being added to the history section of the wikipedia page or is it a separate women through history section?

I really like how you set up your information, it makes it very clear and easy to read. One thing that would help make it more cohesive is connecting the time periods together. As for structure we could not completely tell if this was all going into the history section, but maybe adding all of this information to different sections and spreading it throughout the article could really make the entire article more diverse.

How the sources are implemented is slightly unclear due to it being on a google doc and may be hard to translate onto wikipedia, some paragraphs have comments with tons of sources and some don’t have comments with any sources. Also as of right now the doc does not have the hyperlinks that wikipedia would have, so maybe going through once and finding big key words that could have attached hyperlinks and wikipedia articles would really help the article blend into a wikipedia page format. As for the sources they seem very strong using sources like encyclopedias and research. Some sources like blogs may not be as strong as these other sources, but the scholarly sources really outweigh these blogs that are few and far between. Psychology, being a social science, definitely has many scholarly articles so using these articles is very appropriate to the topic being discussed. Overall the sources are done very well, there are just a few paragraphs at the beginning that lack any sources, but I think these will be much more clear when transferred over to wikipedia.

The information you guys gathered is really well researched and relevant to the topic! Adding specific projects and experiments these women worked on is super important to building credibility and overall showcasing these women’s accomplishments. Your information is also unbiased and non argumentative, as there is information about their success rather than personal information. We also appreciate the diversity of women you chose and the different projects these women worked on to help minoritized communities. Overall, your content is phenomenal and very well written.

Overall we really enjoyed your article addition! There was so much information and you could tell you guys put so much into this and it was really admirable.

Sincerely,

The DJ Group

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)