User:Penguinblueberry/DeepFace/99rebound Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Penguiblueberry


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Penguinblueberry/DeepFace
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * DeepFace

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead
I noticed you moved the lead from the current version of the article to the contents. Depending on what you have thought for the lead, I believe this could be a great way to increase the conciseness and flow of the article.

Content
The content you have added, Current Uses and Method are topics that fit the article well. However, there is not too much you have added for me to add feedback. But great start!

Organization
The article is organized in a way that seems organized and with great flow where the subtopics are aspects that all tie in to the overview and significance of DeepFace.

Impressions
Though there was not much added in this first draft review, the organization of the article by moving the old lead section into a subtopic allows for better flow and more informative introduction in my opinion.