User:Pennynichapa/sandbox

Article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heterosexual%E2%80%93homosexual_continuum

'''Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? '''

Although it is relevant to the topic, I would say that is because the article has very minute description. So it cut to the point easily.

'''Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?'''

The article contain only the origin description of the Heterosexual–homosexual continuum term. It should have contained how this term has progress over the time period. Provide more situation or examples. As the explanation still not clear.

''' Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? '''

No, nothing heavily accused this article.

'''Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?'''

No the source provided is not reliable. Some did have an institution associate with the article but didn't list the author name. Also, the source was too outdated.

'''Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?'''

Only one link does work. It did partially support. More sources required for this article.