User:Pentagon 2057/Newroderick895

this is where we can talk about the adoption related stuff. 1.02 editor (C651 set 217/218) 13:41, 18 March 2018 (UTC) Sorry I put the wrong number for the page.'

Hi take a review on my article on Solar Egg (building). I hope you are going to see it. (newroderick895).

I need some sections on Draft:Kronans Apotek, would you help me? ---Newroderick895
 * Sure, ill try to find some English sources as most are in Swedish. Meanwhile have you considered translating from sv.wiki? 1.02 editor (C651 set 217/218) 22:23, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes i did. ~--newroderick895

Josh Axe
Honestly, a three sentence article would ultimately end up at afd and what more it is a BLP article. this was an article that I created and as you can see, there should be content covering important aspects of the subject and reliable sources to support them. In BLP articles, there should be some content on his early life, education and job. Any other facts or incidents would also need to be mentioned. The article also needs to comply with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines to survive afd. Hope this information helps. 1.02 editor (C651 set 217/218) 07:54, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Solar Egg (sauna)
The lead is acceptable, but a bit more information on its history would be needed and a rework of the constitution section would be good. Also try to move refs out of the lead when there is more prose in the article. Good Luck with it! 1.02 editor (C651 set 217/218) 05:58, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Lesson 1
From now on, I decided that I'll give you a set of weekly lessons, each with an assignment at the end. Please acknowledge that you have read the lesson and done the homework by signing under the 'omework

part 1
Starting with simpler stuff, part 1 would be about Article Assessment and its Criteria. The English Wikipedia is one of the Wikipedias using an assessment scheme, with 6 official quality ratings, from lowest to highest: stub, start, C, B, GA, A, FA. Right now, most of your articles are falling in the stub class. A good benchmark is to try to create an article as a start/C and work it up to B. After B class, an Independent reviewer must assess the article for GA class and above. As per this, an average readable article would need to fulfil the 6 B class criteria: it needs to be suitably referenced with inlines-something that should be manageable, cover most aspects of the topic, have a defined structure with a lead section, is reasonably compliant with the manual of style, have infoboxes and illustrations and not get into technical details. Articles that are in the stub class may be vulnerable to afds or prodding. Once an article reaches the start class, it should not be vulnerable to deletion.

Homework
 * read up and understand the assessment criterion for start, B, GA and FA classes

part 2
This part will be about GANs and FAC. WP:GAN and WP:FAC are places where users list possible Good and Featured articles, and put them up for review (GA) or for community discussion (FA).

Good Articles

Once a article is deemed to have satisfied the Good Article criteria, it will be put up for nomination. An independent reviewer would then thoroughly review the article, highlighting possible lapses in the article that doesn't meet the criteria. The article would also be checked for copyright violations and reliability of references. Once the reviewer is satisfied that the article meets the criteria, he/she would then close the review and pass the article.

Featured Articles

Featured articles are assessed to a more stringent criteria than Good article, with the community free to discuss and point out problems with the article. Similar to Good articles, Featured articles are nominated once a user deems it compliant with the Criteria. Usually but not always, Good articles are close to being featured articles, but may lack length or have some Manual of Style violations.

A-class articles are the highest class that a WikiProject can assign, but due to the criteria being close to that of Featured Articles, most users would bypass the A-class review and bring the article straight to FAC

Assignment
Section 1: Determine the appropriate assessment ratings of the following articles. Please do not check the Wikiproject ratings for the article. (1 mark each)
 * 1) The Trouble Buster
 * A: Pretty great but needs more reliable sources after all it has only 5 sources, i would call it a (stub)
 * 1) Aston railway station
 * A:It is very good but needs some more reliable references, i should call it a start article.
 * 1) Eclipse (board game)
 * A:Right now some of the categories in this article have questions inside it, its also have very few sources, i should call it a (stub.)
 * ✅. Also, it sounds like a copyvio case but I haven't looked into it.
 * 1) Labour Party (UK)
 * A: I absolutely and literally love this article, its has many sources and most of them are reliable, i would call it a (A+ article.)
 * . It should be a B-GA class (or some wikiprojects call it B+). A class article are almost equivalent to FA, which this article does not meet
 * A: I absolutely and literally love this article, its has many sources and most of them are reliable, i would call it a (A+ article.)
 * . It should be a B-GA class (or some wikiprojects call it B+). A class article are almost equivalent to FA, which this article does not meet

Section 2:

In accordance with the respective criteria, comment on an open FAC or fulfill a request for second opinion in a GA review. Provide the required diffs for verification. (6 marks)


 * A: I would feature Labour party, since it is a very good faith article and almost every people in the uk knows about the Labour Party. and it is the second most popular party in the uk and it has 259 seats in the house of commons and 191 seats in the House of Lords.
 * I think you misunderstood, but I agree the article should be a GA. What I asked was to comment on a current WP:FAC
 * oh sorry, i did misunderstand. dont worry ! -newroderick895