User:Perception Check Failed/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Artificial intelligence

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose This article because I find artificial intelligence to be interesting. It matters because it is a very relevant topic that is heavily affecting our lives. my preliminary impression is that it is well formatted and full of useful information.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The lead section introduces the reader to what Artificial Intelligence (AI) is within the first sentence. It then very quickly begins telling the reader about where it is used, a little bit of history, and some of the goals of AI. The lead is also full of references.

The article has a lot of content, and most of the content's major sections have several sub sections. The content appears to be up to date and relevant to the topic, as well as full of information, references, and explanatory notes.

The article is very neutral and seems to focus on being information, there is even a section under the "Ethics" content called "Risks and harm" that is dedicated to the negatives of AI.The sources and references appear to be quite current where they need to be, and there are around 300 different references.

The article is very well organized and easy to read. My only complaint is that the only upper case letter in the contents is the first one, for example "Lack of transparency" instead of "Lack of Transparency" although that might just be a personal preference for me.

There are some images and they are well captioned or briefly described, they also appear to adhere to the regulations.

In the talk section, most posts are dedicated to "Wiki Education assignment" as well as a few things that need to be added. The article is rated B-class and is part of 17 WikiProjects. I wouldn't say that Wikipedia discusses the topic alto different from how the class does, but the article does have a lot more information and goes more in depth.