User:PericlesIsMyWaifu/Gorgo, Queen of Sparta/Francinewithaperm Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

PericlesIsMyWaifu


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:PericlesIsMyWaifu/Gorgo,_Queen_of_Sparta?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Gorgo, Queen of Sparta

Evaluate the drafted changes
Peer Review

1. The Lead Section

Although the lead section is good it is really short, a suggestion I have would be to maybe do a brief overview talking about what's going to be in the article but keep it brief so you don't risk repeating yourself later. The lead-in sentence was great and got straight to who she was and fun fact I am working on Cleomenes for my article so fun stuff!

2. Clarity of Article Structure

Overall the structure is great and the order you have your sections in makes sense and it flows together pretty well. I would suggest maybe adding a section to the end just after the "children" maybe a historical significance section if you are able to get the information and pull something together that is.

3. Coverage Balance

For the most part, the sections are evenly distributed the "CHildren" section is noticeably smaller and it's a little disconcerting I would suggest trying to beef that up more, I think it would make the article feel more complete. I understand that it's hard to write about women in the ancient world because more often than not they are known through their sons or fathers or husbands but I liked how you did your best to keep it focused on Gorgo although there is very little information on her.

4. Content Neutrality

the neutrality of the content was great I didn't pick up any certain tone change or bias as a read so you are doing a great job there! I do want to take this time to say that I would suggest going through and making sure that both words in the titles of the sections are capitalized I think it will make them appear more uniform and really diced the sections they just kind of look lopsided when only the first letter of the first word is capitalized.

5. Sources

The references looked good I checked a few links and they took me to the right place but I did not check all so I think your should (if you haven't already that is). I did see that there wasn't a bibliography or notes section if you can I would add those just to give the article more credibility.