User:Person456789/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Blue Velvet (digital project)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
This was an interesting-sounding article under digital humanities projects, which I discovered while researching ideas for my final project for this course.

Evaluate the article
The lead paragraph is clear and the first sentence says what the article is about. It does not give information about the major sections, and it includes details about where the project was published which is never revisited or re-stated.

The content is relevant to the topic. It is somewhat out of date, having had links updated in the past couple of years but with no mention that the presentation can no longer be viewed because of the discontinuation of the Adobe Flash platform.

The article is not exactly neutral, including a lengthy quotation about political policies which led to the natural disaster which inspired the project.

The sources are almost entirely links to the project itself, plus one personal blog post.

The writing is clear and concise.

The article seems like it is highlighting something notable enough to be included, but without sufficient background in order to be accepted by today's Wikipedia rules, so it is a good example of what is observed in the Week 7 readings.