User:Peter/RfA reviews/CTSWyneken




 * Edit count - Currently 4884, mostly article and article talk. Wikipedia:148, WP talk:50, usertalk 1111.
 * Time around - First edit 20 June 2003
 * Email enabled? - yes
 * Controversial userpage? - only if people dislike public declaration of possible POV (not a problem for me as long as it doesn't enter articles)
 * Any blocks? - no
 * Stupid signature? - no
 * Edit summaries - Mathbot "99% for major edits and 74% for minor edits. Based on the last 150 major and 143 minor edits in the article namespace." Mostly used, bit low in places.
 * Civil? No person attacks? - (check after full namespace review)
 * Mistakes - (ditto)
 * Any edit warring? - (ditto)

Main oppose reasons from last RFA:
 * Low project space edits:
 * Oppose by SlimVirgin, bias on Martin Luther, will need to take a look at this.
 * Slight concern over low edit summary usage
 * Narrow range of edits
 * Not fully familiar with admin processes (e.g. blocking)
 * "wolf in sheep's clothing" accusation/POV pushing
 * General feeling of not being able to trust that admin tools won't be used to help in content disputes.
 * Answers to questions - first couple are rather on the short side, not sure ignoring Doright on an RFA is best option- but not sure on this as I don't know the history of this editor.