User:Peter/RfA reviews/Xyrael

Checklist

 * Edit count - 2780 (before this one)
 * Time around - Account since August, only properly active since March this year.
 * Email enabled? - Yep.
 * Controversial userpage? - not really, unless being a member of Concordia gets you in as much trouble as being leader of it get CJ into... People might object to you living forever, but not much we can do about that if you're immortal is there ;)
 * Any blocks? - Nope.
 * Stupid signature? - Ok, see Xyrael/Sig.
 * Edit summaries - Ok.
 * Civil? No person attacks? - (to check in contribs review)
 * Mistakes - (to check in contribs review)
 * Any edit warring? -(to check in contribs review)
 * Namespace review

Namespace review

 * Main/article space: Overwhelmingly vandal reverts, with some additions of images . As you say, you are a Metapedian. I don't have a problem with that (being one myself!) however, a significant number of people will oppose an RFA if you don't have some significant article edits.
 * Article talk: Again fairly limited due to low number of significant article contributions, however ones that exist seem reasonable enough.
 * User: This looks interesting :) I guess this is the point to mention Vandalproof moderation, so a level of trust being shown there etc...
 * User talk: Lots of welcomes, also (civil, but still makes the point),  (tries to help anyone),  (good message, but no subst on that welcome template),  (willing to admit a (minor!) mistake), generally very civil and friendly :)
 * Wikipedia: Mediation good. AIV: most blocked, some not because no edits after final warning (ok as in some cases, other times need to make sure you check before blocking as an admin)

(other stuff that I can't be bothered to type now, as said on IRC I'm happy to nominate, and will start work on it slowly)