User:Pfant1/be bold

Article Evaluation

First off, from skimming the article, there were numerous categories and subcategories. The article starts off with various definitions of digital divide and is very thorough in its explanation of the term. After defining digital divide, the article helps give a better understanding of the term by stating who it effects, its characteristics, and all of what digital divide involves. Thorough explanation of information is done to most categories and subcategories throughout the article. The articles viewpoints on the different categories are informative and thorough throughout the article but on a couple categories viewpoints were vague. In the categories location and application this was the case. For the location category, location nomenclature was used solely with no further explanation. As for the applications category, the information provided is informative but the inadequacy of it makes the information almost seem random. The article makes a conscious effort to display that it is indeed neutral and not bias. This is shown by the articles numerous definitions of the same word and also the amount of sources prevalent in the article. There’s a total of ninety-six references, followed by a numerous amount of bibliographies, readings, and external links, which all contribute needed information. The links to the citations are set up well and on topic with the information cited. Overall, the use of sources to find information was used very well. The various definitions show the article has multiple views and is not weighing heavily towards a particular position. The article gets various ratings ranging from mid importance to high importance. Based off those ratings, it is apparent that this article is very informative but could still use some touch ups to certain aspects.

Being bold is important on Wikipedia. Being bold is important on Wikipedia.