User:Pg.pinapple/Red beryl/Quercusfanatic Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

User:Pg.pinapple/Red beryl


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Red beryl - Wikipedia
 * Editing User:Pg.pinapple/Red beryl - Wikipedia
 * Editing User:Pg.pinapple/Red beryl - Wikipedia
 * Editing User:Pg.pinapple/Red beryl - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
My peer has written multiple headings and paragraphs, including totally new additions, reworded existing headings, close paraphrasing and exact quoting of the original. The introduction of the original article is rewritten in their sandbox, exactly as it appears in the original. The second heading after introduction in my peer's work, is "History", and then the heading under that is "Rarity". Unfortunately, much of these two paragraphs are exact quotes or close paraphrases form the original article, under the heading: "Deposits and Rarity of the Metal". Underneath these headings of my peer's work, is "Formations" which is also a direct copy of the same heading of the original article. There does not seem to me much original work here. It is hard to criticize my peer's work, because it does not appear to be different from the original article in any significant way. However, neither my peer's article or the original one seem to be biased, or misleading. They are also well written, with zero spelling and grammar issues (that I could determine). As for references, both articles have the same 16 citations, which appear to be academic, accredited and worthy sources for Wikipedia. The information in both sources was relevant to the topic, and well organized as well. Sources were used after most facts. I would say that my peer's work did not improve the article, but instead decreased its quality. They can improve their work by choosing a new heading that was not used in the original article, and provide novel information to the article, with novel academic references. The sources are all very relevant and academic, but the issue is my peer did not ad any new ones.