User:Phaygood/Pickhandle barracuda/TREVORtrbl Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Phaygood


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Phaygood/Pickhandle barracuda


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Pickhandle barracuda

Peer Review
Please answer the following questions in detail addressed to the classmate whose article you are reviewing. Remember this is constructive feedback, so be polite and clear in your suggestions for improving their article. We are all working together to improve the Wikipedia pages for the amazing species.


 * 1) First, what does the article do well? (Think about content, structure, complementing the existing article, writing, etc.)  there is a lot of information that the article does not include which is good, and it also is very interesting to read.   Thank you, although this is reassuring I will continue to add more information.
 * 2) Is there anything from your review that impressed you?  i never heard of the full name of this barracuda before.  The full name is pretty interesting, yet unheard of by most.
 * 3) Any turn of phrase that described the species in a clear way?  yes, it is very clear on its description  Thank you, though I still have room for improvement.
 * 4) Check the sources:
 * 5) Is each statement or sentence in the text linked to at least one source in the reference list with a little number?  No  I managed to put a sublink in a google doc but didn't place it with a number rather it was linked to a period at the end of each sentence.
 * 6) Does the article only discuss the species the article is about? yes I'm glad it was clear.
 * 7) Is there a reference list at the bottom? Is each of those sources linked with a little number? There is a reference list, but it is not linked with numbers. Will work to fix this.
 * 8) What is the quality of the sources?  there are pretty hardy sources that are pretty reliable . The sources were not easy to find.
 * 9) What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article?  not much, just keep on writing some more sources bud.  The more the merrier.
 * 10) Why would those changes be an improvement?  since the main article does not have a lot of content, you can definitely add so much more information and being a main contributor to this article.  I can only do so much but look forward to improving it.
 * 11) Is the article ready for prime-time and the world to see on Wikipedia? If not, how could the author improve the article to be ready?  yes  I think there is room for improvement before the world to see it
 * 12) What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article?  not much Always room for improvement 
 * 13) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article?  i think i could make mine more colorful with the words i use, and hopefully make my article interesting to read. Good job bro. Thank you for your review.