User:Phchan1/Acculturation/Leoalves11 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Phchan1
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Phchan1/Acculturation

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? Overly Detailed

Lead evaluation
I think that the lead of this article is solid and straight to the point but could save some details for the other sections in the meat of the article. Perhaps a simply summary of the points made would be more effective in this section.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No

Content evaluation
You did well with the contributions you made but I would suggest perhaps adding a bit more to your psychological influence from Accultrative stress.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No

Tone and balance evaluation
Fairly balanced and informative article. Simply information based, little to no noticeable bias.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes
 * Are the sources current? Yes
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes

Sources and references evaluation
Everything looks good here.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Not exactly, couldn't really find the information added about sociocultural adaptation though the section was fine so I'm sure your contribution was fine.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? No
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes

Organization evaluation
Good, just hard to pick out your contributions. But article is solid so you did well to blend your work into it.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes
 * What are the strengths of the content added? Simple and to the point, article link addition is good.
 * How can the content added be improved? Only by adding more to it.

Overall evaluation
Good contributions to a good article, nice work. I would add more to what you have already and perhaps even start a new section to expand on your comparative analysis of the relationship between acculturative stress and adaptability levels.