User:Phiferv514/Ennedi Plateau/Trip732 Peer Review

General info

 * Reviewing: Phiferv514
 * Link: Ennedi Plateau

Lead evaluation
The lead effectively provides the reader with the most significant information about the articles topic. After reading the lead, I have a decent impression of what the article is about, including the location, dimensions, and brief archaeological significance of the site. I suggest including a sentence or two addressing the Rock art to improve the lead section, but also avoid being too repetitive and simply restating the section itself.

Content evaluation
All the content is pertinent and relevant to the subject. There is no inappropriate content or content that does not belong to the proper section. No content is over- or under-represented. I recommend adding a Significance sub-section under the Rock art section.

Tone and balance evaluation
The tone of the added content is neutral and does not attempt to persuade or influence the reader to accept a position or idea. All claims are supported by references and none appear to be heavily biased. All the content is unbiased and does not make any claims, allowing the reader to form their own point of view.

Sources and references evaluation
The reference section is a decent size and all the sources are up to date. All the references are reliable, peer-reviewed, and scholarly sources. The reference section is clear of links to blogs, biased articles, and self-published authors. The sources used are all relevant to the subject. The few links I checked worked and directed me to the correct article. The date values for reference 16 may need to be updated. I suggest adding a few citations to the Animals sub-section under the Rock art section.

Organization evaluation
The sections are arranged in a practical order and all the information under each section is relevant to the articles topic. I recommend presenting the Rock art sub-section as its own individual section, but leave the Animals and People sub-sections under Rock art.

Images and media evaluation
It is my understanding that no new images were added. I suggest searching Wiki Commons for any available images of the Rock Art if you have not already. The current images have supporting captions and are laid out in a practical order.

Overall evaluation
Overall, the added content improved the general quality of the page. The article is more complete. I did not notice any major problems.