User:PhilCoulson20/Archive 1

Talk:Avengers: Endgame/GA1
PhilCoulson20, while I appreciate your enthusiasm, as a brand new Wikipedian, it's very clear that you do not understand what the Good Article nomination and review process is, how it works, or how to apply its criteria. It is our experience that editors need to be around for months, have hundreds of edits, and have made many substantive edits to articles. Indeed, bringing an article to the point that it passes its own GA review is invaluable to understanding what the GA criteria mean and how they are applied.

I am one of a couple of people who have independently reversed your attempt to make this article a GA without doing a proper and informed review, Please gain a great deal more experience before returning to the GA process, and I'd like to suggest that you try to find a mentor to guide you in it when you do. Best of luck going forward. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:02, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Very well, I will hold on that for now. Which articles do I edit? — Preceding unsigned comment added by PhilCoulson20 (talk • contribs) 12:12, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
 * You are welcome to edit articles, and you might receive help doing that at our Guild of Copy Editors. Our community processes like GA, FA, DYK, ITN, and others are not places for newcomers as there is a learning curve. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 01:59, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Helstrom CCaH Logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Helstrom CCaH Logo.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like (to release all rights),  (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 18:45, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Hydra logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Hydra logo.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like (to release all rights),  (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 22:46, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Helstrom
Template:Helstrom has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Favre1fan93 (talk) 20:09, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:Helstrom S1 - Poster.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Helstrom S1 - Poster.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:30, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Helstrom S1 - Poster.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Helstrom S1 - Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- / Alex /21  00:40, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Helstrom CCaH Logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Helstrom CCaH Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). -- / Alex /21  00:40, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Toldja
Hello PhilCoulson20, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Toldja, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Jackmcbarn (talk) 23:55, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

October 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. (season 7). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please read WP:GANI Favre1fan93 (talk) 21:16, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * How exactly was I being unconstructive to Wikipedia? I proposed an article for Good article status. Anyone can do that. PhilCoulson20 (talk) 22:58, 5 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Please read WP:CSD and learn about the limited criteria for speedy deletion before doing any more speedy deletion tagging. You just can't invent reasons for speedy deletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:50, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I am discussing with this user at Talk:Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. (season 7) about some of their editing there (nominating the article for GA while being a brand new editor which makes me question how they could be an accurate judge of Wikipedia's policies/guidelines to nominate) and I'm trying not to WP:BITE here, but seeing their CSD edits which you reverted can't help me feel their editing is getting slightly disruptive. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 02:27, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Well, the best attitude for a new editor is to make an edit and see how other editors respond. Not tag a dozen pages for deletion out of the blue. Liz Read! Talk! 02:34, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Those were my feelings as well which I've been trying to convey to this user. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 02:43, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I tagged those pages for speedy deletion because they all just redirect to the season page. I tagged them for deletion because I was going to make episode pages out of them, like The New Deal, or Missing Pieces. PhilCoulson20 (talk) 15:32, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Then when do you think I'm gonna be able to review articles? PhilCoulson20 (talk) 16:20, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Regarding the deletions, once again, if you were familiar with Wikipedia's procedures, you would know that what you are attempting to do (create articles at a current redirect location) does not mean the redirect has to be deleted, especially since the page's history should be maintained. But further to that, even if you want to dive right in to creating a page, it would still need to pass WP:GNG. And as you've continued to fail to show you have a grasp on these basic, yet vital, guidelines of Wikipedia and what should and should not be content, I suggest you read up on how the user sandbox or draft space could be used for you to start drafting such articles, where you can work until you feel something is ready for the article space and other editors can weigh in. As for when you can work on reviews, I would feel once you become an extended confirmed user, and continue to be in good standing with other editors regarding the edits and actions you make in the article space. And by edits, I something along the lines of fixing a spelling/grammar mistake, or add content to an article that is properly sourced, not going around as you have been creating unnecessary split off content (see Helstrom season 1) or GA nominations for articles you have not been significantly a part of. Once other editors like myself and the others who pointed out to you how your actions are being disruptive, see what you are doing and don't consider it disruptive, and you remain in good standing without constantly being noted of how your editing is disruptive, then you could potentially begin seeing how you could assist on reviews of GA content. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:36, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
 * And going around doing this isn't helping your case either. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:37, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Got it! Sorry about that. If nobody responds to this within 24 hours, I'm going to archive this discussion. PhilCoulson20 (talk) 18:35, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
 * That's your prerogative, but know that hiding/archiving a discussion so quickly is generally frowned upon so others can continue to reference it. As well, not every editor is on every single day, so archiving something so quickly makes it much harder for anyone else to add their thoughts. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 20:07, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Please see here. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 20:21, 7 October 2020 (UTC)