User:Philcha/Sandbox

Sandbox
use DHCycal

life


 * Philcha/Sandbox
 * Necto @@@@@@@@@


 * Life
 * per image
 * Security !!!!!!!!!
 * B
 * Secutity
 * Incon -- (e.g. Card 1111111)
 * Brain c !!!!!!!!
 * Nectorplan

Issues
"Space Empires V"


 * Reviewer: Philcha (talk


 * WikiProject_Video_games/Reference_library/Online_print_archive
 * Wikipedia_talk:Good_article_reassessment. RfC, started 18 Oct 2001
 * Wikipedia_talk:Civility
 * Go the Fuck to Sleep
 * Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Master of Orion II: Battle at Antares/1
 * From GG
 * WP Games:
 * Story
 * Images and games.
 * Warcraft II

To do

 * Adapt pic at Trochozoa: more contrast; "brackets" for the "A" and "B" sections; citation(s);make annotated image (template); tell original creator.
 * Mesoderm
 * Yochelcionella for GA

Article drafts

 * User:Philcha/Sandbox/Alan Emrich
 * User:Philcha/Sandbox/Anita Blake
 * User:Philcha/Sandbox/Artifical lure
 * User:Philcha/Sandbox/Bagheera kiplingi
 * User:Philcha/Sandbox/Burns
 * User:Philcha/Sandbox/Cannabis
 * User:Philcha/Sandbox/Copulation
 * User:Philcha/Sandbox/Dan Dare
 * User:Philcha/Sandbox/Dies Irae
 * User:Philcha/Sandbox/DYK QPQ
 * User:Philcha/Sandbox/Euophrys omnisuperstes - for DYK
 * User:Philcha/Sandbox/GAR Drive
 * User:Philcha/Sandbox/Jumping spider
 * User:Philcha/Sandbox/Mammal
 * User:Philcha/Sandbox/MOO 2/MOO2 XXX
 * User:Philcha/Sandbox/MOO 2 - 2
 * User:Philcha/Sandbox/MOO 2 - 3
 * User:Philcha/Sandbox/MOO 2 - 4
 * User:Philcha/Sandbox/MOO 2 - 5
 * User:Philcha/Sandbox/MOO 2 - 6
 * User:Philcha/Sandbox/MOO 2 - 7
 * User:Philcha/Sandbox/MOO 2 - 9
 * User:Philcha/Sandbox/MOO 2 - HZA
 * User:Philcha/Sandbox/MOO 2 - HZZ
 * User:Philcha/Sandbox/Phaeacius
 * User:Philcha/Sandbox/Phidippus clarus
 * User:Philcha/Sandbox/Phidippus clarus
 * User:Philcha/Sandbox/Plants Vs. Zombies
 * User:Philcha/Sandbox/Plants Vs. Zombies - save
 * User:Philcha/Sandbox/Portia (spider) act
 * User:Philcha/Sandbox/Portia (spider) R & H - Notes
 * User:Philcha/Sandbox/Portia (spider) - ZZZZZZZZZZ save
 * [[User:Philcha/Sandbox/Portia (spider)
 * User:Philcha/Sandbox/Portia africana
 * User:Philcha/Sandbox/Portia africana 2
 * User:Philcha/Sandbox/Portia fimbriata
 * User:Philcha/Sandbox/Portia fimbriata 2
 * User:Philcha/Sandbox/Portia labiata
 * User:Philcha/Sandbox/Portia schultzi
 * User:Philcha/Sandbox/Scytodes pallida
 * User:Philcha/Sandbox/Surface Detail
 * User:Philcha/Sandbox/Tardigrade
 * User:Philcha/Sandbox/Temporary
 * User:Philcha/Sandbox/Useful stuff
 * User:Philcha/Sandbox/Warcraft 2
 * User:Philcha/Sandbox/Warcraft 2 - 2
 * User:Philcha/Sandbox/Warcraft 2 - 3 Warcraft II: Tides of Darkness
 * User:Philcha/Sandbox/Warcraft 2 - 3/Sources
 * User:Philcha/Sandbox/Warcraft 2 - 3/Work
 * User:Philcha/Sandbox/Warcraft 2 - 3/ZZZ

GerykHistoryOfRTSSequels

 * GerykHistoryOfRTSSequels
 * GerykHistoryOfRTSSequels
 * GerykHistoryOfRTSSequels
 * GerykHistoryOfRTSSequels
 * GerykHistoryOfRTSSequels

Harv




GAR process and terms
See:
 * Good article reassessment/Warcraft II/2
 * WikiProject Good articles/GAN backlog elimination drives/December 2011
 * Good articles/Cleanup listing
 * Look in at Good article nominations/Report every now and again to see what's happening (if anything) with some of the oldest reviews.
 * Look in at Good article nominations/Report every now and again to see what's happening (if anything) with some of the oldest reviews. Sometimes people need to be prodded to wrap up old reviews, or we need a note here about a review that's been abandoned by its reviewer. Checking one or two and leaving a brief note if there's been no activity for several weeks takes only a couple of minutes. Similarly, sometimes old second-opinion requests can be resolved quickly, without requiring a significant commitment.
 * Stop in at Good article reassessment. Sometimes the issues are simple, so five minutes' work provides a significant benefit to the nominator.

See GAR. Apply only WP:WIAGA - e.g. use only WP:WIAGA's subset of MOS; ignore dead URLs.

A GAR must end in Listed or Not Listed.

Individual reassessment or Community reassessment.

Sign on to an articles before working on it, to avoid duplication, etc.

Avoid topics in which your are unfamiliar, etc. sciences, medicine.

Show result as sorted table. Is there a Javascript?

List of commmom flaws.

How to identify specific broke DOIs, without checking every source. Possible causes: WP editors error; DOI system error; WP DOI template error; any other? How to fix? What it can't be fixed quickly?

GA review template
I'll mark comments when I think they're resolved, highlight ❌ any that are unresolved when most others are done, and strike out any of comments that I later decide are mistaken. I'll sign each of my comments, so we can see who said what - please do the same.

I'll mark the review inuse when I'm working on it, as edit conflicts are frustrating. If you think I've forgotten to remove inuse, please leave a message at my Talk page. Please free to use inuse with your own signature when you're working.

I'll read the article through first, then give comments.

Structure
(sections)

Dead links and DAB pages
I'll check with User:Dispenser/Checklinks and the DAB checker when the content is stable.

Images
I'll check the images when the content is stable.

Lead
I review the lead last, to check that all of it is based on the main text.

IF PASSED I'm very pleased to say that this article meets the Good Article criteria: it provides good coverage, is neutral and well-referenced, is clearly-written, complies with the parts of WP:MOS required for a  GA and uses appropriate images that have good captions and comply with WP's policies on images. Many thanks for the work you've put into this, and for your prompt response to my comments - it's been a pleasure working with you.

If you've got 2 or more articles through GA reviewers, please try to review as many articles as you have nominated for GA review.

IF FAILED I regret that your article has failed to meet the Good Article  criteria as: If you disagree with my conclusion, you may request a reassessment - the procedure is explained at WP:GAR, and you may ask for advice at WT:GAR or WT:GAN - but not both, as that may confusion.

Techniques
To: permissions-commons-at-wikimedia.org
 * Peer review
 * User:Philcha/Sandbox/Help messages
 * User:Philcha/Sandbox/Citing: makeref
 * Google's Ngrams - frequency curve of spellings, e.g. searches for 2 variants, "mollusca,molluscae", with 2 curves, colour-coded.
 * User:Philcha/Sandbox/Reference_methods
 * Manually numbered Notes: Template:Ref. See example at Maevia inclemens: same note used in 2 places; and how to indent neatly.
 * Automatically numbered Notes -
 * T:TDYK
 * Article on the nominator's talk page, in case they do not notice that there is an issue.
 * DYK review codes:
 * OTRS - form:
 * DYK review codes:
 * OTRS - form:

Commons:
 * I hereby assert that I am the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the work [   INSERT LINK OR LOCATION    ].

I agree to publish that work under the free license [  CHOOSE AT LEAST ONE FROM THIS PAGE: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Choosing_a_license#Common_free_licenses — THIS DECLARATION IS NOT VALID UNLESS YOU FILL SOMETHING IN HERE    ].

I acknowledge that I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product, and to modify it according to their needs, as long as they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws.

I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by me.

I am aware that the free license only concerns copyright, and I reserve the option to take action against anyone who uses this work in a libelous way, or in violation of personality rights, trademark restrictions, etc.

I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the work may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

[   DATE OF TODAY, NAME OF THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER    ]