User:Philipphaku/Confidence interval/Ruby00269 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Philipphaku


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
- I have viewed the entire wikipedia page, and I feel like the page is very technical/math, might be hard for most readers to understand. Perhaps adding concise and easy introductory sentences to the beginning of each paragraph might help.

- There are already a lot of references, which is good. Might need to check if there are some contents that just copy-and-paste the whole thing to Wiki (some of the pages have problems like this).

- The page could use some more photos as it makes the idea clearer to readers, especially the "Definition" part and the "Misunderstandings" part. Just make sure you caption the image you put.

- According to the talk page, there are some back and forth on a few paragraphs, especially in the "Misunderstandings" section. You might want to refer to some books or paper to clear that section out. You can read through what the previous editors wrote and try add your thoughts and reference onto the talk page to see if they agree.

- As the talk page stated, the first introductory paragraph is not simple and easy to understand. The section could use more revise since it doesn't feel like an abstract or a summery of the entire page.

- The topic really correlates to other statistics topics, try add more links to the related topics section.

- There could be more information in the History section, and the placing of the section is quite odd. Try move it or change the sentences to make it flow with the whole page.

- Since you haven't start on drafting yet, my recommendations were based on the original "Confidence Interval" page, and what improve or add to the page.