User:Phitha/sandbox

Article Evaluation: Page evaluated: Fake News Suggested changed: -The identifying portion was great! - They did great explaining how fake news has always been a thing, since the AD's and how that ties into how people spread fake news in the 21st century. A lot of the portions they added in about fake Trump stories, Mark Zuckerberg acknowledging these stories and Huffington Post, made the fake news page more credible for sure. Summary: The first half reads a little rough, I would reword or restructure the first half of the article, but the last half looks and sounds credible. I did click on a few links and they all worked. I like the part where I can hover my cursor over a highlighted word and a post or definition would come up. I don't think the fake new article itself is bias. The article is there to inform people of how to spot it and what to do to determine to find it credible. But there are a few portions that make it seem as though they are calling some people out (the CBS producers). I think the sources are all up to date.
 * Because people don't usually use the term clickbait, I would just change a few words/change the terminology to make it more relatable.
 * The last sentence of the third paragraph didn't flow well. I had to reread it a few times, I would change that.
 * While reading the definition portion, they talk a lot about the CBS producers. To make it seem like those producers aren't being targeted I would add in some stuff about other producers saying similar things.