User:Phoebe/essays

Some of the best essays about Wikipedia

c.f User:Phoebe/book


 * Catherine Munro on "why am I here"? -- gorgeous and important


 * User:JzG/Criteria_for_Speedy_Drama


 * No_vested_contributors


 * User:Kirill_Lokshin/Professionalism


 * "Writing for an encyclopedia is not the same as writing for a newspaper, or even an academic paper. In a way, it's more like writing the bibliography for an academic paper. In a way, we aren't even trying to decide (as experts would) what is "true" and what isn't, because that's not what this is. We are summarizing a field, creating a balanced collation of multiple perspectives and views. Theres few decisions to make, few opinions to form, other than to observe which views seem to be more or less relevant views of note, and to understand each (and its sources) well enough to document.

We care that we document each view carefully and with understanding. That is the "truth" we work to here. That, and that alone. Our truth is the truth of the bibliography, and the measure is, have we represented collectively in summary the multiple verifiable sources of note. Drawing editorial conclusions from all of them is the end-use of an encyclopedia, not the work of encyclopedists." -- user:FT2


 * Haiku about Wikipedia policy


 * User:Antandrus/observations_on_Wikipedia_behavior


 * about being on the board http://www.timshell.com/wikipedia/notetoboard.html