User:Phrenic490/COVID-19 misinformation/Lucyc2 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Phrenic490


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Phrenic490/COVID-19_misinformation?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * COVID-19 misinformation

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

It looks like you've gotten a bit of a late start! Luckily, you've still got some time to make some quality edits to this article. Hopefully, some of these suggestions can help guide your research.

Right off the bat, I notice that the current CDC website lists some common myths about the COVID-19 vaccine that this article doesn't quite touch on. I think the main issue in deciding which myths to include and which to omit has to do with relevancy. So, you should consider questions like: how widespread is this myth? How dangerous could this myth be in what thoughts or actions it might inspire in those who believe it? How important is it that this myth get debunked?

The CDC website in general is a great resource on COVID-19. I was part of our class presentation on Vaccine Hesitancy, so I know how much data they have on former and current infection and spread rates, mortality rates, and (of course) data on misinformation!

I also notice that more and more of the coverage of COVID-19 is beginning to focus on "long COVID", or the long-lasting effects that the virus can leave behind even once a patient has recovered. If you chose to do some research on this subject, I think it would work really well with the information present in the "Hospital Conditions" grouping, which is already pretty scant. Good luck!