User:Phsin1129/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Ancient Egyptian architecture

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose to evaluate this topic simply because I've always had an interest in Egypt and their architecture.

Evaluate the article
Everything in the article was relevant to the topic. Nothing distracted me from the original topic. I did not notice any out of date information. The article is pretty informative as it is. So I do not think it is missing an excess amount of information. The article does not misrepresent historically marginalized populations. The article is neutral. I did not think there were any viewpoints that were over/underrated. The links in some of the citations I checked do work. Each fact is referenced with a reliable reference. The information comes from archive.org (encyclopedia of ancient egypt architecture). The sources are neutral and not biased. The sources do come from a diverse array of publications. Upon going to the talk page, what stood out to me the most was that this article page was a victim of vandalism and many wikipedians agreed the article should be locked and watched over. A more recent post in the talk page mentions one instance of plagiarism where a section is typed almost word from word.