User:PhuongLe99/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Interface and colloid science

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I knew about colloids before as searching for graduate programs. I was impressed by how common these materials from nature to industrial applications are regardless that was the first time I heard about it. Understanding the properties of colloids can help us to have a better control on what these involve in.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Lead section includes an concise and clear introductory sentence, has no brief description of major sections (because it does not have any sections), does not have unrelated information, and is concise.

Content: This article is too short and so does not give much in depth information about colloids. The last sentence is too broad and don't really give any useful information. It is better to write about the special properties of colloids and how they are applied in life and then cite those books. It is lately updated and does not deal with any equity gaps.

Tone and balances: neutral and balance.

Source and references: Not all facts are backed up with reliable secondary source of information. The references are thorough but the way they are cited is not effective. The sources are reliable but pretty old. All links work.

Organizing and writing quality: The article is well written. It is not broken down into sections.

Images and Media: Image with a good caption is related to and enhance the understanding of the topic. It does not violate Wiki's copyright. It does not look so visually appealing.

Talk page discussion: This article is a part WikiProject (Chemistry and Physics) and is rated as star-class and low-importance. No conversations.

Overall impressions: Weak, simple and poor-developed article. It can be improved by adding more details about history, properties, challenges of the materials.