User:Phuongdong0701/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: The Toyota Way with Wikipedia link: The Toyota Way
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate: We choose this article because it is an example of discipline in the 2000s that famous company Toyota in Japanese automobile adopts as philosophical principle. This resulted the emergence of Toyota automobiles not only in Japan, but also in the world.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? The Lead includes an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes, it includes the table of content which describe the article's major sections.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No, it it does not. It includes the information that is present in the article.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? Yes, it is short and concise enough.

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes, we would say the article's content is relevant to the topic. The content includes "The 14 Principles", "Research Findings" and "Philosophy, and Benefit results".
 * Is the content up-to-date? Yes, it has been recently edited on 19th January, 2020 so it must be up-to-date.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No there is not. The content includes good information.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral? Yes, it is neutral and narrow to audience.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No, there are not.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? I would say the research findings part seems to be a bit underrepresented here.
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No it does not. Still, it keeps the neutrality and unbiased attempt.

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes, there is a section of bibliography at the end of the article.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes, all the sources are thorough.
 * Are the sources current? Some of the sources take place in 2000s, but it is reasonable because the Toyota Way began in 2000s.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes, they all work well.

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? It is easy to read and concise.
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? I would say there are some spelling errors.
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes, it is well-organized and compromised with the table of content at the beginning.

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? No, it does not. There are no images that enhance the understanding of the topic.
 * Are images well-captioned? No because there are no images.
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? No either.
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? No either.

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? There are no conversations.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? I would say the article seems to lack of images for illustration. We might consider it is part of WikiProjects to include more information and images for illustration if possible.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? It seems that Wikipedia discusses the topic as a way of giving unbiased information to the reader while in class we are absorbing and learning something.

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status? The information is still in need and images might be useful to be provided as illustration.
 * What are the article's strengths? I would rate it as 7/10 scale score for the article's strength.
 * How can the article be improved? Likewise, more in depth research on the sources or images would improve the article.
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? I would say the article is now well-developed and it just needs some improvements.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: