User:Pichaudhary/Discrimination/Mehakdeepkaur001 Peer Review

General info
Pichaudhary
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pichaudhary/Discrimination/Mehakdeepkaur001_Peer_Review?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_peer_review:Christiane Schwieren, Mechanisms Underlying Nationality-Based Discrimination in Teams. A Quasi-Experiment Testing Predictions From Social Psychology and Microeconomics Archived 2015-12-31 at the Wayback Machine, Maastricht University
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Discrimination

Evaluate the drafted changes
Summary: The Wikipedia article on discrimination provides an in-depth exploration of the concept of discrimination, covering various aspects such as definitions, types, forms, causes, effects, and responses. It discusses discrimination in the context of different domains including social, economic, legal, political, and cultural spheres. The article delves into historical and contemporary examples of discrimination based on factors such as race, gender, age, religion, disability, sexual orientation, and more. It also examines the intersectionality of discrimination and its impact on individuals and societies.

Assessment:


 * 1) Coverage: The article offers comprehensive coverage of the topic, addressing various dimensions of discrimination across different contexts and domains. It provides a broad overview while delving into specific examples and case studies to illustrate the manifestations of discrimination in real-world scenarios.
 * 2) Organization: The article is well-organized, with clear sections and subsections that facilitate navigation and understanding. It follows a logical structure, beginning with an introduction to the concept of discrimination and then exploring its different facets in detail. The information is presented coherently, making it accessible to readers with varying levels of familiarity with the topic.
 * 3) Sourcing: The article relies on a diverse range of sources, including academic publications, books, reports, legal documents, and reputable websites, to support the information presented. Citations are provided throughout the article, enhancing its credibility and reliability.
 * 4) Neutrality: The article maintains a neutral tone and strives to present information in an unbiased manner. It avoids promoting specific viewpoints or agendas, instead focusing on providing factual descriptions, analysis, and interpretation of the topic.
 * 5) Depth: The article provides a comprehensive overview of discrimination, but there may be opportunities to further expand certain sections or include more recent developments and case studies to ensure the content remains up-to-date and relevant. Additionally, more emphasis could be placed on exploring the psychological and sociological theories underlying discrimination and its perpetuation.

Overall, the Wikipedia article on discrimination serves as a valuable resource for individuals seeking information about this complex and multifaceted phenomenon. It offers a thorough examination of discrimination across different contexts and provides insights into its causes, consequences, and potential avenues for addressing it. However, readers are encouraged to consult additional sources and perspectives to gain a deeper understanding of the subject.